Animal Farm Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Animal Farm - Essay Example Comparisons between Napoleon and Snowball As part of the leadership, there are two leaders whose ideals differ as one is corrupt while the other is a subtle leader. The two leaders here are Napoleon and Snowball that are a depiction of Stalin Joseph and Trotsky Leon. Ideally, the two leaders were always on contradicting sides in terms of leadership strategies that led Napoleon to dismiss Snowball in order for him to adopt dictatorial leadership. The two leaders of the animal farm had nothing in common except that were both astounding leaders. One of the principal differences between Napoleon and Snowball was the fact that Snowball was a better speaker and had convincing power as compared to Napoleon. He was compassionate and offered support to the animals contrary to the treatment of Napoleon to the animals. This aspect made Snowball a hero as he acted on the belief that all animals in the animal farm had a right to equality (Orwell 8). ... During the existence of Snowball, the animal farm witnessed development, peace, and flourishing in which he sought to make the farm better than during the reign of farmer Jones. However, Napoleon’s rule presented aspects of slavery to the animals in which he incorporated this aspect without the knowledge of the other animal subjects (Rodden 316). Remarkably, Napoleon’s dictatorial rule was successful as compared to the communal leadership by Snowball as the farm became productive the same as the time that Farmer Jones was in control. Napoleon was a cunning leader as he led the animals in the abolition of the human rule then changed after they had achieved their freedom from the humans. He eliminates Snowball as he sees him as an impediment to the success of the farm. In essence, he negated the concept of communism as he viewed it as an aspect of backwardness and underdevelopment. His cunning ways also lead him in to constructing a windmill that Snowball had designed whi le he was alive in order to show to the animals in the farm that he was equally as good as Snowball had been to the animals. Napoleon also spreads propaganda to his own advantage as compared to Snowball who believed in honesty and truthful leadership (Rodden 318). Further, Napoleon orders for the merciless killing of animals after he amends the seven commandments that negated alcohol consumption and murder. The animals experience torture as a way of confessing their offenses within which the trained dogs owned by Napoleon execute the killings (Sapakie10). The collapse of the windmill intended to make the animals work lesser is a chance that Napoleon uses to cast blame on Snowball meaning that he applies all manner of schemes in order

The Advertisement for the Pet Toys Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The Advertisement for the Pet Toys - Assignment Example Therefore, Pets R Us made a legal conditional promise. On the other hand, considering the conditions the advertisement was made in, it may be regarded as an invitation to treat. An invitation to treat represents â€Å"an expression of willingness to negotiate. A person making an invitation to treat does not intend to be bound as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom the statement is addressed.†2 Therefore, the main difference between an invitation to treat and an offer consists in their binding power. That is why establishing the right nature of the advertisement is imperative, considering the legal implications of both. Advertisements are generally regarded as invitations to treat; therefore, the person that is advertising is not compelled to sell to every customer. The display of goods with a price ticket attached to a shop window or on a supermarket shelf is not an offer to sell but an invitation for customers to make an offer to buy. (Fisher v Bell [1960] 3 All ER 731) The case of Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204 is a leading case in this matter. The court held that where the appellant advertised to sell wild birds, he was not offering to sell them. Lord Parker CJ commented that â€Å"it did not make "business sense" for advertisements to be offers, as the person making the advertisement may find himself in a situation where he would be contractually obliged to sell more goods than he actually owned.†3 This makes sense, since in the case of Petz R Us if the advertisement is to be regarded as an offer, it means that the store is bound to sell pet toys to everyone who has read the advertisement and has shown interest in buying the product. Considering that the advertisement was published in a magazine and was available to everybody who read it, it would have been at least awkward to expect the store to have enough supplies for everybody.  Ã‚   I